From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 04:29:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EBC16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 04:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from paladin.fortunaty.net (fortunaty.net [217.160.129.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1450443D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 04:29:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ah@paladin.fortunaty.net) Received: (qmail 10549 invoked by uid 501); 8 Jan 2004 12:29:36 -0000 Date: 8 Jan 2004 12:29:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20040108122936.10548.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> User-Agent: Emai/0.0.2p1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline References: ,<20040108213615.E13090@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20040108213615.E13090@gamplex.bde.org> From: andy-freebsd@splashground.de To: Bruce Evans cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Promise FastTrak X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:29:40 -0000 bde wrote @ Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:38:46 +1100 (EST): > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > > > andy-freebsd@splashground.de writes: > > > ATA channel 1: > > > Master: no device present > > > Slave: acd0 <20X10/H.DH> ATA/ATAPI rev 0 > > > > This is an unsupported configuration. > > This is supported by FreeBSD, but not fully supported by the ATA standard. > I use it whenever possible to monitor bitrot in the support. Actually that is a pretty standard setup for cdrom, you will find it like that in many preconfigured systems, even though this one was custom built. > > > ATA channel 2: > > > Master: no device present > > > Slave: ad5 ATA/ATAPI rev 6 > > > > This is an unsupported configuration. That's no reason to let it regress :) And i think it was clear from the mail that this one wasn't optimal. > This is supported by FreeBSD, but not fully supported by the ATA standard. > I don't trust the support enough to monitor it for writable devices. AFAIR the setup ended being like that because it wasn't possible to boot from ar0 around the time (around 5.0?) the system came into life (I really don't know anymore). If you want to debug it i will let it like that and help you test otherwise i just plug it into master and be done. Andy