Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:19:58 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@freebsd.org> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r522273 - in head/sysutils/lsof: . files Message-ID: <CAP7rwci11RohkJWGAyZM7Ez0%2BT833M0HUxnV1ZA62VA8B1ZAEg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ead20a315b008a881dbfb087eb74e6a3@FreeBSD.org> References: <202001062042.006Kg81F048249@repo.freebsd.org> <202001062102.006L2KrM089339@slippy.cwsent.com> <ead20a315b008a881dbfb087eb74e6a3@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:05 PM Larry Rosenman <ler@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 01/06/2020 3:02 pm, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <202001062042.006Kg81F048249@repo.freebsd.org>, Larry > > Rosenman > > write > > s: > >> Author: ler > >> Date: Mon Jan 6 20:42:08 2020 > >> New Revision: 522273 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/522273 > >> > >> Log: > >> sysutils/lsof: fix build following base r356337. > >> > >> I took the patch from 243122 as it was more correct. > >> > >> PR: 243122, 243083 > >> Submitted by: cy, yasu@utahime.org > >> > >> Added: > >> head/sysutils/lsof/files/patch-dialects_freebsd_dnode2.c > >> (contents, props > >> changed) > >> Modified: > >> head/sysutils/lsof/Makefile > >> > >> Modified: head/sysutils/lsof/Makefile > >> ============================================================================= > >> = > >> --- head/sysutils/lsof/Makefile Mon Jan 6 20:25:36 2020 (r52227 > >> 2) > >> +++ head/sysutils/lsof/Makefile Mon Jan 6 20:42:08 2020 (r52227 > >> 3) > >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > >> > >> PORTNAME= lsof > >> DISTVERSION= 4.93.2 > >> -PORTREVISION= 6 > >> +PORTREVISION= 8 > > > > Was this needed? The package doesn't change, only fixing the build. > > > >> PORTEPOCH= 8 > >> CATEGORIES= sysutils > >> > >> > > I thought build breaks on the cluster needed a port rev bump... The logic is that if the currently-built package needs to change, it requires a bump. If there is no currently-built package because of a build failure, a bump doesn't have a meaningful effect. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP7rwci11RohkJWGAyZM7Ez0%2BT833M0HUxnV1ZA62VA8B1ZAEg>