From owner-freebsd-security Tue Feb 13 0: 9:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D6037B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 8AD576A907 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:09:34 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010213090218.04eaa7a0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:08:03 +0100 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: Secure Servers (SMTP, POP3, FTP) In-Reply-To: <3A88DE7C.C7D414D7@softweyr.com> References: <3A885F40.9C6AD285@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > 3. Postfix - Secure, quite light on system resources, growing support > >Completely opaque configuration, no useful documentation. I still >wonder exactly how this program has such a great reputation, given what >an obstinate bitch it is to make it do something useful. ??? I chose postfix for my IMGate project (FreeBSD mail hub in front=20 of Ipswitch Imail for NT) because it was so easy to configure (vs=20 qmail and sendmail), and based on the success of bunches of NT GUI=20 jockeys (basically zilch *nix backgnd) who have gotten postfix=20 working with little or no help, I chose right and your opinion is=20 180=B0 out from my experience. Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message