From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 5 21:42:24 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EA314BF5; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 21:42:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA07218; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:33:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:33:00 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Nate Williams Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile In-Reply-To: <199912060526.WAA23865@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > I'm already open to all the same risks, since the "patches" contain > > parts of the OpenSSH code. Either none of the port is RESTRICTED, or > > the port _itself_ is RESTRICTED. Preventing the export of the package > > (containing the code in machine-usable format), since some of the code > > is exported in other ways (files/, patches/, etc), is nonsensical. > > If it were my butt on the line (it's not), I'd make the entire port > RESTRICTED, including the mirroring of it. My butt is confident in the judicial system. > > But, you'll have to take that up with the lawyers for WC as well as all > of the other mirror sites. > International $&^!# _ports_ repository? The "restrictions" here make me sick. > > Nate -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message