From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 17:36:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FE916A421 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:36:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F01213C46E for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JBZQJ-0001oS-1q for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:36:35 +0000 Received: from 89-172-37-126.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.37.126]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:36:35 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-37-126.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:36:35 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:36:24 +0100 Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> <47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-37-126.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: <47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:36:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Robert Watson wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but=20 >>> another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability = >>> of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in=20 >>> Solaris. Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental=20 >>> feature there as well. >> >> Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :) >=20 > [Citation needed] I can't provide citation about a thing that doesn't happen - you don't=20 hear things like "oh and yesterday I ran rsync on my Solaris with ZFS=20 and *it didn't crash*!" often. But, with some grains of salt taken, consider this Google results: * searching for "rsync crash solaris zfs": 790 results, most of them=20 obviously irrelevant * searching for "rsync crash freebsd zfs": 10,800 results; a small=20 number of the results is from this thread, some are duplicates, but it's = a large number in any case. I feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is larger=20 than that of FreeBSD+ZFS and they've had ZFS longer. --------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgRGYldnAQVacBcgRAl22AKCNn8JJNdP7fYk3PNsnRhSGdwEn7gCfYUHc clThYOP6zkJD3wFZrFqFHXc= =Et/1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2--