From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 11:05:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634D016A420 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaz99@optusnet.com.au) Received: from fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD2C13C4AC for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaz99@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.192]) by fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lA70BVN1016460 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:11:31 +1100 Received: from bastardx2 (c211-30-66-149.carlnfd4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.66.149]) by mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id lA70BSdO029266 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:11:29 +1100 Message-ID: <00e301c820d2$be015b00$7a9da705@bastardx2> From: "Jaz" To: References: <31796970.30371187974660912.JavaMail.root@zmail.illuminati.org><20070824200726.GA66242@idoru.cepheid.org> <790a9fff0708241424r44517517h357318b8a2004982@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:11:27 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: Re: ZFS + Samba/NFS = ugh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:05:24 -0000 >> > Brooks Talley wrote: >> > > Hi everyone. So far, 7.0 is being pretty darned sweet for me. >> > > >> > > It's probably a known issue, but I haven't seen it referenced >> > > anywhere: it seems that ZFS filesystems can be shared/exported with >> > > Samba/NFS, but they do not accept any kind of writes over the >> > > network, and have other issues with smbclient ("Error in diskattr: >> > > Call returned zero bytes (EOF)" comes up a lot). >> > > >> > > Anyone run into this? Any known fixes? >> > >> > NFS _and_ Samba? >> > >> > Samba is a userland daemon - if it had problems, other applications >> > would have also had problems. >> >> The issue has been discussed before. It is very real: > > where it was found to be caused by lseek behaving differently on ZFS: > > And one person found a work arround for ZFS by removing the > repdir_get* sources from samba: So has anything changed since then? ZFS + Samba seems to be working fine for me. I just installed the October snapshot, made a raidz and compiled the samba that was in ports. I've smb written many big files, many little files and havent been able to make it crash. This is on i386 with only 512mb ram. (it did kernal panic before I applied the zfs tunings) > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-July/074592.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-July/074600.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-July/074601.html > > Here is a test program thats shows some problems with the consistency > of telldir/seekdir behavior: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-July/075401.html > > Read the full thread to get all the information on the problem. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"