From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 13:33:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D399B37B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilzcluster.liwest.at (lilzclust01.liwest.at [212.33.55.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A943FA3 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:33:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm58-27.liwest.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at (8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM) id h47KX4o0001037802; Wed, 7 May 2003 22:33:05 +0200 (MEST) From: Daniela To: Brad Lisoweski , questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 22:33:30 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <60684F9727113D438523F4B5BD9207DE42F8F3@troll3.trangosoft.com> In-Reply-To: <60684F9727113D438523F4B5BD9207DE42F8F3@troll3.trangosoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305072233.30197.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: Re: Why is port 22 open by default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 20:33:14 -0000 On Wednesday 07 May 2003 20:03, Brad Lisoweski wrote: > Would you rather have telnet open? > > IMHO, SSH is secure, and is fine to be open by default. If you are > paranoid, compile ipfilter or ipfw into your kernel and block access to > port 22. Thanks for your reply. I run a shell server, so I need SSH. I'm still relatively new to all this, so I figured if it is open by default, it must be secure. Before I thought that easily exploitable holes are regularly discovered in SSH. Daniela