From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 29 14:36:41 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7C11065672
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de)
Received: from srv3.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [62.146.9.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3962A8FC14
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 7031 invoked by uid 80); 29 Oct 2010 14:36:40 -0000
Received: from 212.71.117.70
	(SquirrelMail authenticated user rainer@ultra-secure.de)
	by webmail.ultra-secure.de with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:36:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1b1fd7c51699466c5acaf68516d01c6e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de>
In-Reply-To: <4CCAD0AF.8080707@icyb.net.ua>
References: <ab57553ca5f4ad33ab091924d72be95b.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de>
	<4CCAC9FF.5020207@icyb.net.ua>
	<f3024e9897eb579ead47785ba08ac51e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de>
	<4CCAD0AF.8080707@icyb.net.ua>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:36:40 +0200
From: rainer@ultra-secure.de
To: "Andriy Gapon" <avg@icyb.net.ua>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 8.1-RELEASE and cddl-sources from STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:36:42 -0000

> on 29/10/2010 16:44 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following:
>>> on 29/10/2010 15:26 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following:
>>>> Does that actually make sense?
>>>> Or should we just upgrade to STABLE and live with the problems?
>>>> ;-)
>>>
>>> What problems?
>>
>> I don't know.
>> If all was good, we wouldn't have to wait until January for RELEASE,
>> right?
>> ;-)
>
> Releases are produced based on time policy (e.g. every half a year), we
> are not
> waiting for anything in particular.

Good to hear.

>> Seriously, though, we have a policy to only install a release if it's
>> called RELEASE.
>
> Even if you seriously mangle half a source tree by hand? - This is in
> regard to
> your original question.

Yes, this concern is valid.

> IMO, stable branch is the best release.

Thanks for your input.


Best Regards,
Rainer