Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:36:57 +1000 From: "Chris Knight" <chris@e-easy.com.au> To: "'Kai Mosebach'" <kai.mosebach@freshx.de>, <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: LinuxThreads replacement Message-ID: <007601c3467b$5f20e960$020aa8c0@aims.private> In-Reply-To: <MDAEMON-F200307100233.AA3354688md80000778503@aims.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Howdy, Be aware that FreeBSD threads implementation mostly conforms to SUSv2, where linuxthreads mostly conforms to SUSv3, so if your code relies of SUSv3 features you're stuck with linuxthreads. (ie pthread_spin_* and pthread_barrier_* function calls). I could of course be completely wrong, as I'm still trying to get up to speed with thread implementations. Is it just me, or are threads just a complete evil, which very few people understand correctly and are able to implement and/or use them correctly? Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator E-Easy Tel: +61 3 6334 6664 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.e-easy.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Kai Mosebach [mailto:kai.mosebach@freshx.de] > Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2003 2:33 > To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org > Subject: LinuxThreads replacement > > > Hi, > > can libthr / libkse easily be used as a liblthreads (LinuxThreads) > replacement ? > > cheers Kai
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?007601c3467b$5f20e960$020aa8c0>