From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 30 0:37:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chen.org.nz (adsl-210.54.19.51.quicksilver.net.nz [210.54.19.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1816137B405 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by chen.org.nz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0U8b7l00672; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:37:07 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from jonc) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:37:07 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: "J.S." Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ---> Upgrading 'qt-2.3.1' to 'qt-2.3.1_1' (x11-toolkits/qt23) Message-ID: <20020130213707.B536@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <20020130091311.17eda673.johann@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020130091311.17eda673.johann@broadpark.no>; from johann@broadpark.no on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:11AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:11AM +0100, J.S. wrote: > ---> Upgrading 'qt-2.3.1' to 'qt-2.3.1_1' (x11-toolkits/qt23) > > Why does portupgrade always have to upgrade from portname-X.X to > portname-X.X_1? The "_{12345}" suffix indicates that the port-maintainer has made a siginificant change to the port that it warrants a version bump. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck" - Curly To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message