From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed May 10 18: 1:34 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from iaces.com (horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0900E37BB32
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 May 2000 18:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from proot@iaces.com)
Received: (from proot@localhost)
	by iaces.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e4B11M823850
	for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2000 20:01:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Paul T. Root" <proot@iaces.com>
Message-Id: <200005110101.e4B11M823850@iaces.com>
Subject: PPP NAT and IP protocol 50
To: questions@freebsd.org (Questions FreeBSD)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:01:22 -0500 (CDT)
X-Organization: USWEST !nterprise Networking - ACES
X-Phone: (612) 664-3385
X-Fax: (612) 664-4779
X-Page: (800) SKY-PAGE PIN: 537-7270
X-Address: 600 Stinson Blvd, Fl 1S
X-Address: Minneapolis, MN 55413
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi all,
	I'm trying to get SecuRemote (Checkpoint FW-1) encryption
working thru my FreeBSD 2.2.8 User PPP router. I was able to get
it to pass the ISAKMP stuff through but I think ppp doesn't know
what to do with the IPSEC (ip proto 50) traffic.


	Any ideas? Would ppp from 3.4 or 4.0 be better able
to handle this? I've been kind of looking for an excuse to
upgrade.

Thanks,
Paul.

-- 
A computer store in CA is using this in their slogan...
"our prices are dropping faster than the president's pants..."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message