From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jan 24 01:52:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA15188
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA15148
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:51:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by solar.tlk.com 
	id <m0tf1qm-00020hC@solar.tlk.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:50 MET
Message-Id: <m0tf1qm-00020hC@solar.tlk.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:50 MET
From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum)
To: pst@Shockwave.COM
Cc: security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ownership of files/tcp_wrappers port
Newsgroups: tlk.lists.freebsd.security
References: <199601231119.NAA01191@grumble.grondar.za> <199601231133.DAA00324@precipice.shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>Probably something like
>
>  .if (/usr/local/lib/libwrap.a) and !defined(NO_WRAPPERS)

why not 
.if (/usr/local/lib/libwrap.a) and defined(USE_WRAPPERS)

>so that distribution binaries can still be built (use whatever the
>convention is that we do elsewhere and document the root makefile).

I think the default should be to NOT use libwrap.a. Adding USE_WRAPPERS=YES
to /etc/make.conf takes only 1-2 seconds...

bye
  Torsten

PS: I'm currently out of town...