From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 24 14:36:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1E016A6EF; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374A743D70; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:36:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8434746CBC; Wed, 24 May 2006 10:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:36:13 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <200512060258.jB62wCnk084452@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060524153540.E48623@fledge.watson.org> References: <200512060258.jB62wCnk084452@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 bpf_jit_machdep.c bpf_jit_machdep.h src/sys/conf files files.amd64 files.i386 options.amd64 options.i386 src/sys/i386/i386 bpf_jit_machdep.c bpf_jit_machdep.h src/sys/net bpf.c bpf_jitter.c bpf_jitter.h bpfdesc.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:36:29 -0000 On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Add experimental BPF Just-In-Time compiler for amd64 and i386. > > Use the following kernel configuration option to enable: > > options BPF_JITTER > > If you want to use bpf_filter() instead (e. g., debugging), do: > > sysctl net.bpf.jitter.enable=0 > > to turn it off. > > Currently BIOCSETWF and bpf_mtap2() are unsupported, and bpf_mtap() is > partially supported because 1) no need, 2) avoid expensive m_copydata(9). > > Obtained from: WinPcap 3.1 (for i386) Do you have any plans to MFC this to RELENG_6? I've had a question about getting it up and running for intrusion detection / network monitoring. Robert N M Watson