From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  4 17:19:46 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA79416A418;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 17:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7141613C474;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 17:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4E82082;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:19:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5C0207F;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:19:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 75FD6844A4; Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:19:38 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
References: <861w7um5o5.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<e7db6d980802030759x6db9bf1dq8992542bd8d2e017@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080203162918.GK57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20080203121112.426a8c25@kan.dnsalias.net> <86zlugeqaz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net>
	<86r6fsd55s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041206270.13899@sea.ntplx.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:19:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041206270.13899@sea.ntplx.net> (Daniel
	Eischen's message of "Mon\, 4 Feb 2008 12\:10\:29 -0500 \(EST\)")
Message-ID: <86abmgd4gl.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: threads@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning errors in libthr
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:19:46 -0000

Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > (unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?)
> Please do not bump private, it was never meant to be bumped like this.

This is not substantiation, this is the old monkey telling the young
monkey "this is the way it's always been done".

With all due respect to the old monkey, the young monkey simply can't
understand why FBSD and FBSDprivate should be assymetric.

The young monkey would also like the old monkey to explain to him what
harm will come of this (the young monkey has asked this already, but the
old monkey has declined to respond).

Finally, the young monkey would like to point out that this is all very
poorly documented.  While aware of the freebsd_versioning.txt document
written by the old monkey, the young monkey can't find anything in it
about private symbol spaces.

If the old monkey is in any way offended by this, he is free to
s/old/mature and experienced/ :)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no