From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 26 10:19:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B183D2F8A03 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 10:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49WVMJ23HKz3bY1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 10:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.22.204]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MQuPJ-1jPzsl0bBP-00Nwhy; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:19:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:19:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Matthias Fechner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installation of 12.1R and 11.3R fails Message-Id: <20200526121951.d239e337.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20200525110946.dd7440ac.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6b51OluA1xQdj+Mw06pzPc0WQX0eR0TvQAHHQOZcSnYG+UIlwR8 9/j8QNdC7Q316nu4N7l4LNsNOt+0UYo5nP1h2h5sAhjfmmEeyzYnAee5Lq1yqXmx6F8nKZU Tu5bE4Zhlai5DqOIr6UggmHyuox4ExJ/HWlU5wiNjg/kAraedwqQnjFnfrGrJ9xCWIB9k98 Q7egxVIW64ZazVcU1uHPg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:w/motju55ng=:FDTolsT3QZWjJ2dPd5wBQy 3nP8CQ5+hAOmTLIh1dYzw4QBmOtkxTKGTG18rhJzBSnZ8+7M2YVOBUNo8wtSHgioVQWSNvsBB F9N2giNvg8MO+OZO1D4GHEBsGDcSt2oWYIrHkKsX6fRIHSOkGLT7/m7FAE89apvYyKm67cSFb zA/kLCH3jaOqgXv9byOoQhr9bzY8Q+wD9CoqmomBcJMRuN4UgEd9/PP+QeufJFb2BnEDSUl3z eqKi96zpTd+cMSEYkr1CmQ4rY+PI0jUdqGfHTEsLONJ3GeVgalCV5FoGsq/eIseNNIjP3xrZz urqgAxdslCrCbEFm08iDX6AlCel8a6GpO77uOkPW42nwGC2oxxdEjEIEUiU1CEW9cDzzA0fb6 j5mDlIB0Cw5L0+Zi4AY09EEG3C4c9xtP2kuebYBl0+ByAZ7Kuk4vXDEFbaanLl3Ktwv/Do+Zj +3iXXpJMN7eahwJYUnFtylqWTv0ig/ToViPLlAbI8i/psvEpX8k3SNaCJW/WVfMsb4/vfubFb nRMFBdBoGR60W6aJZCHAEZbuwYfC7XxwqUCTkNdq3lei2rgYYfGLAK8dOYmtTi1FAqn2MPiAW aM0RnpfZzTVA4a/lnEWhemEbdGUCZoHSiZ3VwxQo95/EIZSRdhI/IXGHS07mfWI9Q0a9Wm1rg f8hjlaeIdGeNIsJ7GWFcZAD+E8ZQ4C3c09+f7tS17zroD841wH5f+MWeLg8i6l4B4/8uqsf2M /j6nmCo3pyGdHHTdbdttfVEQIl04j3OdcNyUDfgkYO2dV+ALkqZjDVDRSHLPQacMi5zqvFsRk QMkw1HJ8dM0OFY24pa5LM/L/19NJRIVmXUTKLsQde9+AJXWtF/d9snecUEb9D33HOBtupe8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49WVMJ23HKz3bY1 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 217.72.192.73) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.05 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.477]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.222.22.204:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:217.72.192.0/20, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.740]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.86)[0.862]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[217.72.192.73:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[217.72.192.73:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:19:57 -0000 On Tue, 26 May 2020 08:08:17 +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 26.05.2020 um 01:29 schrieb Michael Sierchio: > > cat < /mnt/etc/rc.conf > > fsck_y_enable="YES" > > background_fsck="YES" > > background_fsck_delay="60" > > thanks a lot for this script, very interesting! > > Here you could also use: > sysrc -f /mnt/etc/rc.conf fsck_y_enable="YES" > > Has the advantage to not wipe the existing file, but only add/modify the > keys you would like to touch. > This is maybe more future proof. Allow me a little addition: The setting background_fsck="YES" is something I try to avoid at all costs, because it often leads to "problems of unclear reason", i. e., filesystem inconsistencies that you won't immediately recognize as such, but they are present and lead to strange program behaviour. That's why personally I absolutely prefer background_fsck="NO" and have the system perform a filesystem check and repair if needed, because _if_ the system issues such a process, it does so for a good reason, and performing this process, if needed even twice, makes sure your system's data is clean and healthy. In my experience, the background_fsck will not be able to deliver this in every case. Sure, this comes at a certain price (boot takes longer), but if the integrity of your data is considered, why not? :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...