Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:16:49 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, des@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330387 - head/misc/compat8x Message-ID: <525D8691.1050500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <525D84B6.6000306@FreeBSD.org> References: <201310151139.r9FBdeLZ054477@svn.freebsd.org> <525D7FBB.3060108@FreeBSD.org> <525D84B6.6000306@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-10-15 14:08:54 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: > On 15-10-2013 14:47, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On 2013-10-15 07:39:40 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: >>> Author: garga Date: Tue Oct 15 11:39:39 2013 New Revision: >>> 330387 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/330387 >> >>> Log: - Update to 8.4.201310 - Remove liblwres.so.50 (not >>> present on 8.4) - Remove libstdc++.so.6 to avoid conflict with >>> compat9x [1] >> >> A binary built on 8.x requires both compat8x and compat9x now on >> 10.x where libstdc++.so is not installed by default. Is it >> intentional? > > It's better to require 2 compat ports to be installed than conflict > both compat8x and compat9x, what would make it impossible to run a > 8.x binary AND a 9.x binary on the same system. Okay. Then, this change deserves an entry in UPDATING, IMHO. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXYaRAAoJEHyflib82/FG+eoH/RAS/qSrK/tH2ToX+3MhSf7c bkDJEznqQHRuNOJg4DXXKFr1roESUc9SwhcY0vwWeuz57wb7N7K4u5UlzUd78O10 2DRwZwc8sKh2y3bnbHp7idAwYiKI7lobHmj3jdAkG98X3nzxRrz+Uw+grrWkwudl F1VDIQYIxg/zlkuVivVcsrwhfnmqAj7D+czUZc2OqXvSl/sTR0JFCYB4v8yLc81t R6Px3YtquVB7WTQNb7SEQ5xgBVGgqwaSKXLnrCEaVEPmFnAE0gfjCzFE9+ZMtr+S A8+hVmtVyLonYw6g3HPFRWmODXvk7jgrJ6t7bzhMDi+Ieazne6537Q5au1AAN9s= =EzpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?525D8691.1050500>