From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Mar 12  7:12:33 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.sminter.com.ar (ns1.sminter.com.ar [200.10.100.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA09514D1B
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:12:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar)
Received: (from fpscha@localhost)
          by ns1.sminter.com.ar (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id MAA19155; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:09:34 -0300 (GMT)
From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar>
Message-Id: <199903121509.MAA19155@ns1.sminter.com.ar>
Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990312094955.6494T-100000@fledge.watson.org> from Robert Watson at "Mar 12, 99 09:56:24 am"
To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:09:34 -0300 (GMT)
Cc: wes@softweyr.com, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, andrewr@slack.net,
	archie@whistle.com, andrew@squiz.co.nz, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

En un mensaje anterior, Robert Watson escribió:
[...]
> The Solaris folk now appear to have ACL support in the base OS install +
> FS.  Where did they find the space to store the ACLs?  Adding any more

I think they store it sacrificing 3rd. level indirection, but I'm not sure.


Fernando P. Schapachnik
Administracion de la red
VIA Net Works Argentina SA


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message