From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 1 17:15:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C6716A41F; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schwabe@uni-paderborn.de) Received: from mail.blinkt.de (mail.blinkt.de [88.198.169.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF9613C4BE; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schwabe@uni-paderborn.de) Received: from dslb-084-061-185-001.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.185.1] helo=styx.local) by mail.blinkt.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I52YR-000Lel-49; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4687DA36.1010604@uni-paderborn.de> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:45:42 +0200 From: Arne Schwabe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <200706131858.l5DIw4Yr009448@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070701081714.GA44671%slw@zxy.spb.ru> <468772E0.5080406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <468772E0.5080406@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Thompson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_bridge.c if_bridgevar.h src/sbin/ifconfig ifbridge.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 17:15:47 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson schrieb: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:58:04PM +0000, Andrew Thompson wrote: >> >>> >>> All non-tagged traffic is treated as vlan1 as per IEEE 802.1Q-2003 >>> >> >> Common practice: non-tagged traffic is treated as "native vlan". >> > I'm confused now. Is this practice different from what the 802.1Q > standard says? > You can have a tagged Vlan 1 and an untaged (native in cisco speech) on dot1q port (trunk in cisco speech). Some standard even uses vlan 0. Iirc some Qos stuff. A real world example: interface GigabitEthernet0/21 description uplink cat6509-e switchport trunk native vlan 506 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,323,506 Has a tagged vlan with ID 1 and an untagged vlan with corrosponds to vlan 506. I have not looked at diff but if the native vlan or untagged ethernet frames are treated as vlan 1 this example vlan 1 and vlan 506 would be mixed. Arne