Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:30:33 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= <groudier@club-internet.fr> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bus_dmamap_load Message-ID: <14932.59983.360316.243974@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101042102170.1781-100000@linux.local> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101040942570.11733-100000@beppo.feral.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101042102170.1781-100000@linux.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
G=E9rard Roudier writes: > Btw, you missed the `de' driver that also performs bus_dmamap_load()= on > mbuf's as a possible candidate. >=20 Does it actually do this? I see all the code protected by: =09#if defined(TULIP_BUS_DMA) But I do not see TULIP_BUS_DMA defined anywhered. I think it was inherited from NetBSD and the define was clobbered in rev 1.19 of if_devar.h: =09Unifdef -U__NetBSD__ See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/pci/if_devar.h.diff?= r1=3D1.18&r2=3D1.19&f=3Dh Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14932.59983.360316.243974>