From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 27 07:39:27 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D959AC6F2
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu)
Received: from fnsib-smtp06.srv.cat (fnsib-smtp06.srv.cat [46.16.61.63])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF86C39F
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu)
Received: from [10.0.1.111] (j83162.upc-j.chello.nl [24.132.83.162])
 by fnsib-smtp06.srv.cat (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8852797B5F;
 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: EABI 4 vs EABI 5?
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <55B57895.30909@rgbaz.eu>
 <96059129-D5DB-4610-9F3C-AF3803610D0E@bsdimp.com>
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
From: ArnoB <freebsd@rgbaz.eu>
Message-ID: <55B5DDEA.6070602@rgbaz.eu>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:29:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <96059129-D5DB-4610-9F3C-AF3803610D0E@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:39:28 -0000



On 27-07-15 05:40, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 2015, at 6:17 PM, ArnoB <freebsd@rgbaz.eu> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile FreeBSD 11 head on a FreeBSD 9.3 amd64
>> machine, to be used on my Raspberry B.
>>
>> TARGET: arm
>> TARGET_ARCH: armv6
>>
>> Everything goes quite well, yet I'm seeing a slight difference between
>> the binaries in the temporary installation folder and the ones on
>> the Raspberry Pi.
>>
>>
>> on the PC, FreeBSD 9.3 amd64:
>> $ file /bin/ls
>> /bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI4 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
>>     interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, FreeBSD-style, for FreeBSD 11.0 (1100077), stripped
>>
>> on the RasPi, FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT:
>> $ file temp/bin/ls
>> temp/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI4 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
>>     interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, FreeBSD-style, for FreeBSD 11.0 (1100077), stripped
>>
>> Almost identical, except for the EABI version.
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to get exactly similar binaries in any way?
> They both should run, possibly with some compat9 libraries. I don’t think we have a package for that.
>
> However, I think the problem maybe a clang-built system vs a gcc-built system.
>
> Warner
>
Hi Warner,

Thanks for your reply.
I didn't think of gcc vs clang at all....

I'll install clang, rerun the whole build process,
and check if that "solved" it.

greets
arno