From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 9 09:13:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFB11065670 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2D18FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA03333 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:13:33 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201112090913.CAA03333@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 02:13:28 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Two problems still present in RC3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:13:38 -0000 FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 is looking good, but I'm still encountering two problems. Firstly, when I try to configure VLANs in /etc/rc.conf, I'm getting errors. For example, if I use vlans_re0="1 2" ip_addrs_re0_1="192.168.0.1-4/16" ip_addrs_re0_2="10.0.0.0/24" to create two VLANs on the interface re0, I get error messages saying that "create" commands (presumably using ifconfig) have failed. The interfaces SEEM to be configured correctly, but the messages -- which must be coming from scripts called by /etc/netstart -- are troubling. Secondly, there's still some strangeness in the sc terminal emulation. When I run jove, the status line at the bottom of the screen isn't entirely in reverse video as it should be. Only parts of it are, and the highlighting changes -- seemingly at random -- as I work. Neither of these is likely to be a showstopper (so long as the first won't cause me networking problems I haven't observed yet), but both are probably worth looking into. --Brett Glass