From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 30 22:40: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9219E37B417 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0V6e3p18090; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201310640.g0V6e3p18090@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: John Merryweather Cooper Subject: Re: ports/34103: [NEW PORT] gfax (missing-in-action for fifth-toe) Reply-To: John Merryweather Cooper Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/34103; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Merryweather Cooper To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, john_m_cooper@yahoo.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/34103: [NEW PORT] gfax (missing-in-action for fifth-toe) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:35:09 -0800 It occurs to me that a cleaner way to enable gfax (and very different from the authors approach) would be to create an actual "fax" entry in /etc/printcap and run all the input through gfax a la apsfilter. -- jmc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message