From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 27 17:39:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC8C37B401 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BF9E610F411; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:39:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:39:55 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Matt Heckaman Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: OpenSSH 2.9 Message-ID: <20010727193955.D16223@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Matt Heckaman , FreeBSD-STABLE References: <20010727161538.S87424-100000@epsilon.lucida.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010727161538.S87424-100000@epsilon.lucida.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG /usr/ports/security/openssh{-portable} is why there is no rush. > I'm wondering if there are any plans to MFC OpenSSH 2.9 before the release > of 4.4 and if not, is there a specific reason, or has it just not been > tested enough? Thanks :) -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message