From owner-freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 12:29:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DBF106564A; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from snipe.secure-computing.net (snipe.secure-computing.net [209.240.66.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417A08FC2D; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (unknown [209.240.66.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ecrist@secure-computing.net) by snipe.secure-computing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A9517075; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <9484DE45-E872-4C83-A9F3-CA8A27368CEE@secure-computing.net> From: Eric F Crist To: pyunyh@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20080425002507.GB62719@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500 References: <1F58C85A-CBD3-46A8-9392-0B5994992475@secure-computing.net> <20080425002507.GB62719@cdnetworks.co.kr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/123053 X-BeenThere: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Writing device drivers for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:29:34 -0000 On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote: >> Andrey, >> >> I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted >> my >> system. The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected >> to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port: >> > > By chance, are you referring to kern/123053? That's what the subject of the email says... > >> re0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=9b >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) >> status: active >> >> Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up >> correctly and seems to function just fine. Is there any load testing > > I think, that's normal. > >> I should perform for you folks? >> > > Try one of network benchmarks in ports/benchmarks if you want. > >> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=9b >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active I've run some benchmarks, and they seemed to go pretty badly. After running a few, I realized that I still had two network interfaces up, (em0, and the testing re0), I did an ifconfig em0 down, and was unable to connect in or out from the remaining re0. Perhaps this code isn't all the way complete. Eric ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks