From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 21:40:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDE72C6 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D6A2D80 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob105.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKU45A0qQUvYZnYW+iB6VojpymIQAjjtYp@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:40:36 UTC Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k48so7441287wev.5 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=VBWh4W6WCADkXeFBa8XWVqlWqW7xh25VDY1ntAd9P6s=; b=fiSQ12ULXQDzqEAT64lxx5G7Eh8tXv8H9XCvicvKhYmdgYW37tjIQDIYdMc3j5AprW 1SHwuzSDTaNC4s1Oe+PGQ5xxSJUIG5n5KTePS3Q9BK4THL2S+ySTrlACS5jz6ww3ikx3 4iFef/Ku46XkBBl0TJT2FccDsGHfXIN6AkJOhYzUducHFGcs96V0nSKGV5nKvm3NUUUL 2D+CotZuK+mrsljGaRfN4KXDi/23rPhOepWkFuctzPtR3JTEl9tCjKTXYvV0RXE1hE2M bmHeXrGT0NZ8Z/ezCpZUWUX5TY6Gi8nc8SP6SNSe+gCRdPnSmPh0OjhpmKJArLj00JDb etjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl0jwLLjYFhWcs9UP/sp0GXA+7I722j4FB2N2Bfa8gYFsrEfO2hPpDmLrWJmnxwqpEcNh3ArO1mQQmIT0ogulf8QRfdSlZctxvLa8oK7PhP8QM2k9wGQbnY2K9SqiikcCHff604 X-Received: by 10.194.220.42 with SMTP id pt10mr65064863wjc.60.1401831634011; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.220.42 with SMTP id pt10mr65064857wjc.60.1401831633887; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jr1sm1000103wjc.13.2014.06.03.14.40.32 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s53LeVfG011745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:40:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s53LeV2W011744; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:40:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:40:31 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201406032140.s53LeV2W011744@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: lists@eitanadler.com, marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, theraven@freebsd.org, vmagerya@gmail.com, uqs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:40:37 -0000 >On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: >> ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are >> about to make a meaningful report... > >This is *not* the reason for registation. > >The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having >a way to talk with the reporter drastically increases the chance that >the bug will get fixed. Registration offers verification of the >submitters email. >We would rather get fewer higher quality and more engaged bugs than >what we've had in the past where bugs were a one way vent. > >To preempt the next question: why don't we allow users to submit via >email but verify with a token? That system isn't possible with how >the gateway is set up now. Its a long term possability. If someone >wants to help set that up please contact me offline (at bugmeister@). > >What about bug followups via email? That one won't be supported for a >bit as we get used to bugzilla. It certainly on the cards to support >in the future. Will send-pr continue to work or not? Anton