From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 2 19:59:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA15940 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 19:59:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt053nb4.san.rr.com (dt053nb4.san.rr.com [204.210.34.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA15935 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 19:59:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt053nb4.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA22585; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 19:58:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <361592CD.3C0CCB43@dal.net> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:58:21 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE-0929 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Smith CC: Greg Lehey , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ELF kernel? References: <199810030033.RAA02872@dingo.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith wrote: > > Isn't this a bit late in the Beta to start changing kernel formats? > > There's mixed opinion on this; at the moment we just want to get the > tech out there for people to play with it. The big kicker is that if > we *don't* change now, we'll have yet another big-gulp change point in > front of the 3.0.x stability release, which will also be Bad. I agree, get it all out there now. There have been so many changes during the beta period already that you might as well get all the pain over with before the release. For my money, I won't even consider "beta" testing 3.0 until after the -Release, AND the tree is branched. You can't seriously call the last two weeks a beta test of anything, there were many days when you couldn't even build a release. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message