From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Aug 12 10:08:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA04556
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA04551
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <52579(3)>; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:07:30 PDT
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177512>; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:07:18 -0700
To: Igor Vinokurov <igor@zynaps.ru>
cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner), vince@mail.mcestate.com,
        ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: trafshow port under -CURRENT 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Aug 97 03:49:21 PDT."
             <199708121049.OAA00267@access.cs.ibank.ru> 
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:07:11 PDT
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <97Aug12.100718pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Igor,

  I think it's because the ports committers are too overloaded.
I wonder if we need seperate GNATS categories for port bugs vs.
new port submissions and port updates, so that updates can be
given a higher priority by committers.

  Bill