From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 21 09:38:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C93516A401 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from net@dino.sk) Received: from bsd.dino.sk (bsd.dino.sk [213.215.72.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86BA43D4C for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from net@dino.sk) Received: from lex ([213.215.74.194]) (AUTH: PLAIN milan, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by bsd.dino.sk with esmtp; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:38:48 +0100 id 00000386.441FC9A8.000084FB From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:37:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> <441FC5E0.5080604@packetfront.com> In-Reply-To: <441FC5E0.5080604@packetfront.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603211037.48439.net@dino.sk> Subject: Re: multiple routing tables X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:38:05 -0000 On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:22, Ragnar Lonn wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond > > > > An answer would be to re-implement vimage for newer versions of > > FreeBSD but > > it's a bit of overkill and I was wondering if anyone had done anything > > in this direction? > > Implementing vimage (or similar) support in 6.x is something we are very > interested in and it might be possible for us to help out with such an > undertaking, if people thought it worthwhile. > > Regards, > I can only second on this. I found vimage really usefull for various tasks and just now I am building new server on 4.11-RELEASE with vimage patch because there is no other possibility for me to do what I need in an easy and elegant way. While Marco's patch goes way beyond multiple route tables support, it does everything really easy for me. Unfortunatelly, patch is too bulky for me to understand it - if anybody had something based on 6.0 or -current, I will test it, but nothing more. Regards, Milan -- Please reply to the mailing list only. This address is filtered.