Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:46:13 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r339615 - head/net-mgmt/clog Message-ID: <20140114014613.GB76343@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201401131755.s0DHtqDD092052@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201401131755.s0DHtqDD092052@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 05:55:52PM +0000, Renato Botelho wrote: > New Revision: 339615 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/339615 > > do-install: > - ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/clog ${PREFIX}/sbin > - ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/clog.8 ${PREFIX}/man/man8 > + ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/clog ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/sbin > + ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/clog.8 ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man8 Manual pages are normally installed under MAN[x]PREFIX, where optional x is section number. E.g., in this case, it should have read ${MANPREFIX} or ${MAN8PREFIX}. FWIW, I personally always preferred unsectioned MANPREFIX, as it seems silly to put different sections in different places (at least in FreeBSD; perhaps it makes sense in other unices). Do we really need this numbered manprefixes, anyone? :) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140114014613.GB76343>