From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 23 00:09:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA09982 for current-outgoing; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA09976 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0uBcCv-0003wFC; Tue, 23 Apr 96 00:08 PDT Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id FAA07652; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 05:48:00 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Paul Traina cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: socks support native in freebsd? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:46:40 MST." <199604222246.PAA06258@precipice.shockwave.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 05:47:59 +0000 Message-ID: <7650.830238479@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I know I'm the "let's not bloat things out" guy, but I want to get some > feedback on this idea. It seems like a big gain. > > I'd like to bring socks4 (and later socks5) into the FreeBSD source tree > directly. The reason for doing so is that minor modifications to our > utilities, such as telnet, ftp, et al need to be performed. I figure it > would be more useful to the user community if we just make these changes > /and/ ship our default binaries with socks support included. YES! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.