Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:18:19 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? Message-ID: <20060827211100.N82634@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200608280208.29733.max@love2party.net> References: <20060825233420.V82634@hub.org> <200608261848.16513.max@love2party.net> <20060826165209.V82634@hub.org> <200608280208.29733.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Max Laier wrote: >> Actually, email would provide no ability to do the 'request-challenge' >> that we have currently implemented in an effort to *reduce* (although I >> know it won't eliminate) ppl "spamming" the system ... > > You can do as all the other websites and email a "confirmation link" > back to the sender that they have to click on in order to commit the > data to the system. Hrmmm, that's an idea ... k, it will involve a multie step process per server though ... run script, which sends the IDTOKEN to server ... server sends back email wtih confirmation link, which would return the two lines in /var/db/bsdstats that you'd have to cut-n-paste to the file, and then re-run the script a second time to actually send the data ... the only thing that needs the 'confirmation' step is getting the /var/db/bsdstats populated with valid data ... after that, the data only needs to be sent in, but confirmed, since the data in /var/db/bsdstats is the confirmation ... so subsequent months the data would just need to be 'bounced' through ... Does that sound reasonable?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060827211100.N82634>