From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Nov 5 02:28:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA01128 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 02:28:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA01122 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 02:28:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA25176; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 02:28:07 -0800 (PST) To: Tommy Hallgren cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Thread at Redhat In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Nov 1997 10:40:51 +0100." <34603F23.41C67EA6@mdstud.chalmers.se> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 02:28:07 -0800 Message-ID: <25173.878725687@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > My local guru appears to be out of date in his recommendation of freeBSD > over Linux. I've been running RH as a web server in test mode and I've I'm glad that you found an OS to suit you, but I still totally fail to see how your evidence of how this "guru" is out of date with his recommendation. FreeBSD makes an excellent web server, as numerous ISPs (from Yahoo on down) will attest. Jordan