From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 12:16:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E649016A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D21543D1F for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:16:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 22A6EBA24; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:15:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:15:38 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: docproj port X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:16:15 -0000 I noticed that there is now a couple of new docproj ports, one with jadetex and one without...I'm wondering if the fdp should be updated to reflect the new ports, as the old docproj port appears to be depreciated, or at the very least no longer needed. Thanks, Josh Paetzel