From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 22:42:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4961EA98 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a.mx.bartk.us (173-10-122-205-BusName-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.122.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3032B3729 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 22:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.45.6] (unknown [192.168.45.6]) by a.mx.bartk.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483343D004A for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53FE5CF4.1000901@bartk.us> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:34:28 -0700 From: Bart Kus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD TDMA: Legalizing 440MHz 802.11 modems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 22:42:03 -0000 Hello, I'm wondering if you can tell me if it's possible to modify the FBSD TDMA code to make this card: http://www.doodlelabs.com/products/radio-transceivers/sub-ghz-range/420-450-mhz-dl435-30/ legal to use in its intended spectrum. By default the card violates two Part 97 rules: 1) Emissions are limited to 200kHz bandwidth 2) Symbol rate is limited to 56kSym/s Is it possible to slow down the subcarrier symbol rate in that Atheros chip? Is it also possible to then space the subcarriers tighter together to respect the 200kHz emission bandwidth limit? They'd have to come closer together anyway to uphold OFDM subcarrier orthogonality. Thanks for any clues, --Bart PS: I'm asking in the interest of the HamWAN.org project. We're trying to find a more mobile solution, which penetrates through forests and some buildings. 440MHz seems to fit the bill, but hardware is really hard to come by.