From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 18:25:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CED1065670 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe.gain@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B348FC1E for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so2637175wib.13 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ev23JrGn64fDzoCzAVL5OMdDm9KZkzxYHESz2H0vHM8=; b=FYZDAEcuVRw6NMx1w7KvAmIwcuhCw1hZMB+wYakLGzF1ssIgq7WjWL7lk3tRce9AfO L0lMVdGcxcU+/4orZXAF3/Q+AGOlpR6k3OUb9p0xpgeskANaw3lCwE97E0/tSfYc9Edf wcHRtQRovBRX0dBGY99ojHvBN2mfc0OVWCPY5TP2DFEndU1zaQpv6Jbzl8ZOYzPaCoyU 6YY7CpqrRCsLdteSClElLu8TxtqMmK/K9EEULZQvOuarQ4JnzQJzRd8HYA+TCyWy+fOq AyT/3MlcOh2/PbqhXc2e87+/KCfOt5mpl2kstlWWk2N69K4J8Mg7XdP7smLxFUnHWr+d AhSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.2 with SMTP id eu2mr22303905wib.10.1340303129943; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.220.96 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org> <4FE35208.40708@queernet.org> <4FE35616.9080304@queernet.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: Joe Gain To: Stas Verberkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:25:31 -0000 On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > Mark Felder schreef op 21-06-2012 19:28: > >> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:31 -0500, Wojciech Puchar >> wrote: >> >>> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. >> >> >> This has not been decided in court yet. >> > Additionally, the exceptions for using the GCC runtime library for non-GPL > executables > is limited to what hey call "eligible compilation processes", what rules out > using > proprietary GCC plugins or other combinations of core GCC functionality with > non-GPL > tooling and extensions. > Please note that this is indeed not tested in court. Therefore, reality may > turn out > even more interesting. That's why a lawyer's answer should always be "it > depends". :) > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" So, has anyone compared the performance of clang vs gcc compiled in daily use-- for example as a server? Anyone can cherry pick a couple of binaries, but how important is this for the performance of FreeBSD world? -- joe gain jacob-burckhardt-str. 16 78464 konstanz germany +49 (0)7531 60389 (...otherwise in ???)