From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 21 13:22:55 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF8016A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9031A43FEC
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8019672DA8; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7AD0C72DA3; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
In-Reply-To: <3F6D92EB.1020102@ciam.ru>
Message-ID: <20030921132145.W68357@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <3F6D92EB.1020102@ciam.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: -current brake ufs for -stable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:22:55 -0000

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:

> I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
> with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken.
> I think it's because of extended atributes -current wrote on it. I don't
> like to turn off extended attributes on -current at all. I'd like to
> have some option for mount to disable it (I've not found it on manpage).

If you newfs'd the partition with -current, you made it UFS2.  -stable
can't mount UFS2 partitions.  Newfs it with -stable (or the appropirate
option on -current, I don't recall it) so its mountable on both systems.

I'm making a broad assumption here since you haven't explained what "FS
was broken" means.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org