From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 09:58:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 6D68D16A4D1; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:58:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:58:41 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: eqe@cox.net Message-ID: <20031210175841.GA98679@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why support alpha?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:58:41 -0000 On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0500, eqe@cox.net wrote: > Isn't alpha dead? Why bother supporting them in 5.2 it seems like wasted > energy. Yes people still use it but for them there is 4.9 which works > fine. You could better serve the freebsd community by focusing on the > future of computing like amd64, great dual support, better drivers, etc. > and most people know this, so why not let alpha die. I personally like > alpha but it has no future. Well, thankyou for your thoughts, Mr. Nobody. Kris