From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 09:35:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0A716A4B3 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DB84400E for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:35:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6Bqw-0004Bf-00 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 18:35:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6Bqv-0004BX-00 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 18:35:25 +0200 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6Bqv-0001xz-00 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 18:35:25 +0200 From: "Simon Rutishauser" Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:43:37 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <200310051037.37551.kellers@njit.edu> <20031005151206.GA76900@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Pan/0.13.4 (She had eyes like strange sins. (Debian GNU/Linux)) Sender: news Subject: Re: wav to mp3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 16:35:30 -0000 Am Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:12:07 +0200 schrieb Erik Trulsson: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:37:37AM -0400, T Kellers wrote: >> I did a make search in the ports collection and didn't see what (I >> think) I need, so I'll ask here. >> >> Is there a utility (or utilities) in ports for converting .wav files to >> mp3? > > That is essentially what an MP3 encoder does, and there are plenty of > those in the ports collection. > Personally I like audio/bladeenc, but audio/lame is also nice and has more > features and options. Lame is (I have not tested this, but this seems to be the common opinion) faster and produces better quality than bladeenc. You should also look at oggenc (which does not produce mp3s but OGG files) Peschmä