From owner-cvs-include  Thu Dec  5 11:06:51 1996
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-include>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA24825
          for cvs-include-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA24815;
          Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA09897; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:06:14 -0800 (PST)
To: =?KOI8-R?Q?Andrey_Chernov=2C_=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru>
cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>,
        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include utmp.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 21:11:26 +0300."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.961205210444.222A-100000@nagual.ru> 
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 11:06:14 -0800
Message-ID: <9893.849812774@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> We already change UT_NAMESIZE, lets change UT_HOSTSIZE in the same round
> :-)

I agree that we should batch all these changes, and quickly before people
start firing at us for breaking their utmp logs multiple times in a row.

Simple questions:  Is there concensus for bumping UT_HOSTSIZE to the
next increment?  32 or 64?  What about the other fields that Peter
suggested?

Assuming that we can reach a quick consensus on this, I'd be happy to
see Peter go ahead and Just Do It.

						Jordan