Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Nov 1997 19:42:17 +0000
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DEor=F0ur?= Ivarsson <totii@est.is>
To:        Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>
Cc:        Scott Morris <smorris@tsi.gte.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: gzipped programs
Message-ID:  <346CA999.41C67EA6@est.is>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971112180701.1351C-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Scott Morris wrote:
> 
> > Steve,
> >
> > You can pretty much assume that if you gzip a file in the bin directories
> > it will be a Bad Thing(tm). The level of badness will depend on the
> > particular file you zip. You really don't gain much if anything by
> > compressing binaries anyway. You can compress old logfiles and such but
> > stay away from configs etc. Of course if you installed the source you can
> > compress or remove it if you need the space.
> 
> I am a little clueless here, but why is it a bad thing to do this?  I just
> compressed BitchX with what seems like a 50% ratio, and with the pseudo
> device gzip, it seems to work fine.
> 
> - alex
You can gzip all binaries exept gzip and gunzip, It will slow down the
system
but you gain diskspace, the install diskette is containing gzip
executeables.

I did run system with most binaries gzipped because of diskspace
problems and
it worked fine for me!
-- 
Þórður Ívarsson		Thordur Ivarsson
Rafeindavirki		Electronic technician
Norðurgötu 30		Nordurgotu 30
Box 309			Box 309
602 Akureyri		602 Akureyri
Ísland			Iceland

---------------------------------------------
FreeBSD has good features,
Some others are full of unwanted features!
---------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?346CA999.41C67EA6>