From owner-netperf-users@freebsd.org Fri Nov 20 18:02:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: netperf-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E044F4692D7 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from tor1-11.mx.scaleengine.net (tor1-11.mx.scaleengine.net [209.51.186.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cd4Bt5xj0z4RPB; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.1.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by tor1-11.mx.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1B271D96B; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 tor1-11.mx.scaleengine.net F1B271D96B Subject: Re: zoo reboot Friday Nov 20 14:00 UTC To: mike tancsa , Mateusz Guzik Cc: Philip Paeps , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , netperf-admin@freebsd.org, netperf-users@freebsd.org References: <1f8e49ff-e3da-8d24-57f1-11f17389aa84@sentex.net> <2691e1fd-5a27-4dd0-2ef7-b1c06fd4e751@sentex.net> <5A5094BC-D417-4BA6-97E2-7CB522B51368@FreeBSD.org> <4ec6ed6f-b3b4-22ae-e1ec-93a46f3d88ea@sentex.net> <0ddec867-32b5-f667-d617-0ddc71726d09@sentex.net> <5549CA9F-BCF4-4043-BA2F-A2C41D13D955@freebsd.org> <270b65c0-8085-fe2f-cf4f-7a2e4c17a2e8@sentex.net> From: Allan Jude Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:02:23 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <270b65c0-8085-fe2f-cf4f-7a2e4c17a2e8@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Cd4Bt5xj0z4RPB X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: netperf-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions related to the netperf cluster. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:30 -0000 On 2020-11-20 12:56, mike tancsa wrote: > Its a bit of an evolutionary mess the current state of zoo.  I wonder if > we are better off re-installing the base OS fresh on a pair of SSD > drives and have the base OS on it and leave all the user data on the > current "zroot"... Considering 240G SSDs are $35 CDN it might be easier > to just install fresh on it and not have to worry about resizing etc. > >     ---Mike > That has many advantages. The resizing is not overly involved, and only touches the swap and bootcode, not the pool itself. Getting the OS to a fresh separate pool gives us some flexibility with zpool versions, and more ability to play with boot environments etc on zoo, so is likely a great path forward. -- Allan Jude