From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 00:47:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B698106566C for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D7E8FC16 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGLJu-0005rq-Ou for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:47:18 +0100 Received: from cpe-188-129-99-141.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.99.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:47:18 +0100 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-99-141.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:47:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:47:02 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <20101110110428.GA3505@traktor.dnepro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-99-141.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <20101110110428.GA3505@traktor.dnepro.net> Subject: Re: igb dual-port adapter 1200Mbps limit - what to tune? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:47:20 -0000 On 11/10/10 12:04, Eugene Perevyazko wrote: > CPU is E5620@2.4GHz, 8 cores, irqs bound to different cores skipping HT ones. Unless you need the CPU cores for other tasks on the server, they won't help you with network throughput here. Faster but fewer cores might. > Tried 2 queues and 1 queue per iface, neither hitting cpu limit. Are you sure you are not hitting the CPU limit on individual cores? Have you tried running "top -H -S"?