From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 11 21:14:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD69106564A
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B788FC1C
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA28847;
	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:14:49 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1QgNoX-000N34-AR; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:14:49 +0300
Message-ID: <4E1B67C7.8040402@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:14:47 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
References: <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CALH631=F4bSgNDE4w0qcXGMgGxZRRwCP9n-H4M0c+1UEaqWr7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E147F54.40908@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<CACqU3MVLr5VXRovs1uV+zHazJi2rrjE9Sp3XzsCPJ0Un06pmDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CAJ-VmomNcbGggbQePi2kBC7uRJm3BenMNKjsqkH5hFLqudsCvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110707015151.GB71966@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<CAJ-VmongFDGi0amaqod5_NBQcH+guA5QMXtttCjTD=ccB==+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACqU3MVv-YpttXWYnvraR3PT9nh9P1AWMxoXJPevMRhNt4cr5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmokC+pzoB_x31UGSNt2oRLXfzOK9aXhCMR3FBm7iGEyaAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACqU3MXVdQfYEBNb9OLnt7CudiBRdvaq3Cd_HXBC8ZrCpmRFvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MXVdQfYEBNb9OLnt7CudiBRdvaq3Cd_HXBC8ZrCpmRFvg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:14:53 -0000

on 11/07/2011 23:33 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
> patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is
> particularly interesting. But it is not likely to happen in FreeBSD
> where FreeBSD committers are clearly more free than other at
> checking-in un-publicly-reviewed stuff (especially _bad_ stuff).
> 
> This would of course apply even to long-time committers, no matter how
> it hurt their ego (which I definitively do not care about).

Have you just volunteered to review all of the patches that I would like to
commit?  And are you prepared to take responsibility for quality of your reviews?
I am sure that other developers will gladly accept your offer too.

-- 
Andriy Gapon