From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 16:31:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5733B16A41B for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@netmediaservices.net) Received: from fep5.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E4913C45A for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@netmediaservices.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (d221-71-130.commercial.cgocable.net [216.221.71.130]) by fep5.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C17D1E4D; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:50:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47B4632E.20904@netmediaservices.net> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:50:06 -0500 From: Victor Farah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <47B1F883.6020407@netmediaservices.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20080212180525.024f9b80@mail.computinginnovations.com> <47B31441.8040801@netmediaservices.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20080213110427.02527db8@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080213110427.02527db8@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080214-0, 02/14/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:31:40 -0000 Alright, I have the machine up to 6.3-STABLE #1 now. I've changed subnets on the one card that pushes the traffic. There is a run down of the machine now. The machine is still having the weird network traffic problem of capping at around 100mbps and then dropping to 10~20mbps the next minute. Any suggestions? em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1b inet 192.168.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:de media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1b inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast X.X.X.127 ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:df media: Ethernet 1000baseTX status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 10:01 AM 2/13/2008, Victor Farah wrote: >> I'm updating the system to 6.3-release now. >> >> All 13 machines are on the same subnet but they are scattered across >> different switchs. >> >> netstat -m: >> 7716/399/8115 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) >> 7388/326/7714/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 7380/41 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) >> 0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 16705K/751K/17456K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) >> 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) >> 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) >> 0/6/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) >> 0 requests for sfbufs denied >> 0 requests for sfbufs delayed >> 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile >> 193374 calls to protocol drain routines >> >> ifconfig -a: >> em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=b >> inet 192.168.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.X.255 >> ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:de >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) >> status: active >> em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=b >> inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.255 >> ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:df >> media: Ethernet 1000baseTX >> status: active >> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 >> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > What IP's are you trying to configure on em0 and em1? These cannot be > on the same subnet unless you are trying to bond them, which I don't > believe is available in 6.X. > > -Derek >