From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 1 07:58:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7607137B401; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 07:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B7D43FEC; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 07:54:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 19MUE3-00060J-01; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 16:54:23 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (520065502893-0001@[80.131.113.82]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 19MUDo-1KbGqmC; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:54:08 +0200 Received: from Magelan.Leidinger.net (Magelan [192.168.1.1]) h51Es7Sa011869; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magelan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h51Es6fE001849; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:54:06 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: re@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030601165406.20550ba0.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200306011300.h51D0DMH042667@fledge.watson.org> References: <200306011300.h51D0DMH042667@fledge.watson.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520065502893-0001@t-dialin.net cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:58:25 -0000 On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Robert Watson wrote: > Areas requiring immediate testing I already reported to -current that I wasn't able to umount a msdosfs slice a while ago (umount failed with "busy" and the slice was still mounted), last week I had the possibility to test it with a May 25 kernel again and I still wasn't able to umount the msdosfs slice. I tried not with the same harddisk as last time and the slices wheren't created by the same Windows system, so I exclude the possibility of a damaged slice. I try to get time to connect the harddisk again to my system (with a May 30 kernel) before I return the disk, but I think the issue should get added to the list of issues to look at before 5.1 (at least to be able to add it to the errata). Bye, Alexander. -- ...and that is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7