From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 03:10:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655C2106566B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538AD8FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o023A7Jn026923 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o023A75X026921; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:10:07 GMT Message-Id: <201001020310.o023A75X026921@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org From: wen heping Cc: Subject: Re: ports/142221: [Update]biology/py-biopython:update to 1.53 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wen heping List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:10:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/142221; it has been noted by GNATS. From: wen heping To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, wen@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/142221: [Update]biology/py-biopython:update to 1.53 Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:01:47 +0800 --0016368e26947cdcb6047c25b5b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The maintainer of biology/py-biopython is mauricio@arareko.net but not python@, I could not understand why this PR was not sent to mauricio@arareko.net but to python@ ? wen --0016368e26947cdcb6047c25b5b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The maintainer of biology/py-biopython is mauricio@arareko.net but
not python@, I could not understand = why this PR was not sent to
mau= ricio@arareko.net but to python@ ?

wen
--0016368e26947cdcb6047c25b5b9--