From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Nov 27 13:53:16 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711E8114CCC8; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0A87BC4E; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 0A45BDA66; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:53:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Antoine Brodin Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r486008 - head/lang/ghc References: <201811271341.wARDfReG041847@repo.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:53:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201811271341.wARDfReG041847@repo.freebsd.org> (Antoine Brodin's message of "Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:41:27 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <1s76-6307-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1A0A87BC4E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.61 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.10)[0.096,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.78)[0.783,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.74)[0.736,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:53:16 -0000 Antoine Brodin writes: > Author: antoine > Date: Tue Nov 27 13:41:27 2018 > New Revision: 486008 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/486008 > > Log: > Fix build on head amd64 after ld.bfd is no longer installed > > With hat: portmgr Do we have a (meta) bug tracking ld.bfd removal? I would be surprised if LLD_UNSAFE works as out of 149 ports only 4 define USE_BINUTILS. Or did you mean aarch64 (not amd64) where base ld.bfd never existed but during FreeBSD 11.0 was provided via devel/aarch64-binutils?