From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 31 4:45:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CBD37B491; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:44:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VCjNH72774; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:45:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:45:23 +0100 (CET) From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-firewall@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPF or IPFIREWALL? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And again, I want to ask for the usage of both built in IP filtering units for FreeBSD (we use actually 4.2-STABLE). What are the benefits of each filter type? Which one is the faster one? Are there any advantages/disadvantages to mention? Which one of the filter is the most "FreeBSD" native? Thanks in advance, Oliver - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message