From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 13 4:12: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ucb.crimea.ua (UCB-Async4-CRISCO.CRIS.NET [212.110.129.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A056154E2 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:11:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@ucb.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by relay.ucb.crimea.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3/UCB) id OAA99379; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:12:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:12:25 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Stan Brown Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IP Tunneling, is it possible? Message-ID: <20000113141225.A98748@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Mail-Followup-To: Stan Brown , questions@FreeBSD.org References: <200001131159.DAA09342@netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <200001131159.DAA09342@netcom.com>; from Stan Brown on Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:59:24AM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Moved to -questions] On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:59:24AM -0500, Stan Brown wrote: > I have 2 physicaly seperate segments of the same subnet that I need to > connect logicaly. I have a FreeBSD gateway/firewall machine on both of > the subnets conected to the corporate network. > > Specificaly, I have an existing network 170.85.106.* netmask > 255.255.255.128 which connects to the corporate 170.85.113.* network this > is then is routed to 170.85.109.* Now I have in my office some more > machines that I need to set up for the 170.85.106 net. > > Is there a way to encapsulate packets on the 2 parts of the 170.85.105 > network, and send them to the other part, where they would be > unencapsulated? I think this is called IP Tunneling and Linux appears > to support it, but I would rather not change the 2 gateway/firewall > machines over to Linux, if I don't have to. > > I regert if you jave seen this request before, I have submited it on > questions, and networking, but the only response I got was a flame > about my typing. > Take a look at: - nos-tun(8) - IPIP (proto 94) encapsulation with tun(4) driver; - ports/net/tund - IPoverUDP encapsulation with divert(4) sockets. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message