From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 9 14:58:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00199 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:58:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.6.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA00192 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert@usr01.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16182; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:58:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr01.primenet.com(206.165.6.201) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd016135; Fri Oct 9 14:58:09 1998 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA28168; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:58:04 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199810092158.OAA28168@usr01.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? To: ben@rosengart.com Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 21:58:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Snob Art Genre" at Oct 8, 98 08:26:20 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So when is someone going to look at the reproducible, fully documented, > weeks-old filesystem bug I posted to this list two days ago? You mean the two day old filesystem bug? ;-). > Would a send-pr help? Probably not to get a fix into 3.0, unless you included code and also sent email to a committer. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message